Is it a PLN, PLE, VLE, LMS, CMS, or something else?

Good question.  In fact, this is a question that everyone should ask and be able to answer when choosing the different technologies and social, f2f contacts that ultimately become one’s PLN.  In my blog post I say, ” If I choose and determine that an LMS is the best way for me to learn, then the LMS is my PLN”.  My point was that if a person can justify why an LMS best serves the individual’s learning needs, interests, and learning preferences, then who am I to judge.  I also say this because many people are for or against an LMS; I think this is the wrong conversation to be having.  We should be addressing the question you pose that forwards this notion of articulating a learner’s rationale in developing a PLN.  A learner’s rationale for using any tool will also depend greatly on how the tool is being used.
Clearly for me, an LMS is never my PLN.  For this MOOC (and for the first time), I am completely staying away from Moodle and it’s made all the difference!  I weave in-and-out of blogs, tweet, and read The Daily in order to interact with individuals and content for the course.  This part of my PLN works for me and I can explain why it works for me…but I cannot judge others if they can explain an alternative way that works best for them, including using only an LMS.
If someone says the only place they learn anything worthwhile is through some Moodle course, online community, etc., who am I to argue.  Technologies today are so integrated anyway that everything really is just varying degrees of a PLN.  Think of all the different ways online content can be brought into Moodle for example.
Published in: on September 18, 2010 at 8:22 am  Leave a Comment  

Are LMSs still relevant? Do they work?

Details | LinkedIn

My response…
Let’s assume we all agree that one example of an LMS is Moodle. Moodle is like a pencil. If I require my students to use a pencil in class, am I reverting back to the Stone Age? Does using a pencil in class automatically mean that I support traditional teaching/learning methodologies and techniques? It’s my belief that a pencil can effectively and efficiently be used to in conjunction with (a) asynchronous and synchronous communication, (b) different delivery methods, both online and offline, and (c) different learning theories: behaviorism, cognitivism, social constructivism, socio-cultural theory, connectivism, etc.
There is no reason why YouTube, Google, or any other web tool cannot be implemented into a class that uses Moodle or any other “LMS”. An “LMS” could just as easily be the entire Internet. The problem is not the “LMS”, it’s the type of communication, delivery, and learning theory being used.
Published in: on August 4, 2010 at 9:57 pm  Leave a Comment  

To Use or Not to Use an LMS

Below are responses to a post regarding Moodle and the audience of a classroom.

“[When using Moodle], why would you say the target audience is the teacher?”

When educators (in mainly formal institutions where grades matter) set up a learning management system (LMS), such as Moodle, they are the target audience as a rule. Those who participate within the LMS are more of a group than a network (Downes, 2006, slide 8) where teachers tend to have more control over the content and degree of openness. And yes, external web tools can and are being used but they are being “siphoned” through an LMS because the intended audience is still the teacher. Students can interact with each other in an LMS but it is still within a contained atmosphere that requires anyone to see this interaction to join “the group”. Each teacher then must evaluate the type of course to be given, the maturity level of the students, etc. to determine which type of LMS is best suited for their teaching context or whether they will use an LMS at all.

As an alternative to an LMS, think of the entire Internet as an “LMS”. Imagine using Google Wave, blogs, wikis, twitter, multimedia tools, etc. in absence of any particular LMS to conduct a class. Now the audience begins to shift away from the teacher, and learning becomes more open. Learners as part of a formal class begin to interact more with the global society as opposed to mainly interacting with those within the LMS group. I recently saw a TED talk with Sir Ken Robinson where he discussed the importance of creating “organic” learning environments for students, and I see learning in a non-LMS environment in the same vein.

What are your thoughts?

———-

Subsequent response…

…the teacher may relinquish full control to the learner and allow the learner to drive and control the content and learning environment.

I agree with you as I suspect most would. The question becomes is this surrender of power best served within or outside a LMS. If my teacher were to give me full rights over the content and learning environment, I could then choose whether or not to use the LMS in the first place (I’m thinking CCK08, CCK09, Edfutures, etc.). And as a learner, I would still have this perception that even though I’m using outside web tools and that I’m in control of the learning environment (however one wishes to define “control”) that the main audience is still my teacher because all the content was being channelled through an LMS.

Can you envision what it would look like in an EFL/ETL class?

Yes, I can envision it becoming more common in the future through the ongoing development of a personal learning network (PLN). My current research, in fact, addresses PLNs and professional development among EFL/ESL educators. In developing a PLN, I see an LMS as a “stepping stone” in facilitating EFL educators (i.e., learners) to become more interdependent.

Published in: on May 30, 2010 at 1:42 pm  Leave a Comment  

Computer mediated communication

Today’s session will focus on computer mediated communication: VLE, PLE, PLN, LMS, etc. We will particularly be looking at Moodle and how this platform can be an option for complementing what you do face-to-face (f2f). Check out NineHub – a free Moodle hosting site – if you’re interested in setting up your own Moodle page.

See how other UVM teachers are developing their pages:

UVM LDC MTY 2009 WEBSITE

SCIENCE TEAM

FOOD AND BEVERAGE

Blog

LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION

BUSINESS MANAGEMENT

TECHNOLOGY TRAINING

ENGLISH IN THE GLION SCHOOL

OTHERS


Related sites: Blackboard, CyberExtension, Desire2Learn, Dokeos, eFront, First Class, ILIAS, Joomla, Moodle, NineHub, Podclass, Quia, Sakai, Sclipo, Second Life, Web Train, WiZiQ, Zunal
Other sites: Blog tutorial, Podcasting tutorial, PDF995 (free program to convert files to PDF), Scribd (document host)
Article: Reading recommendations for the low-skilled

Published in: on July 16, 2009 at 10:00 pm  Leave a Comment  
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 889 other followers